The relationship between Bernie Sanders, the U.S. Senator from Vermont, and Benjamin Netanyahu, the long-serving Prime Minister of Israel, has been marked by a complex and often contentious dynamic.
As prominent figures on the global stage, their interactions and perspectives on key issues have sparked intense debates and drawn significant attention from the international community.
The US Senate and House leaders of both political parties have invited Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to address a joint meeting of Congress.
Read: Alabama Sen. Tuberville And Texas Sen. Cruz Lead Charge To Repeal Biden’s Natural Gas Tax
Sanders blasted the invite, calling Netanyahu a ‘war criminal” and saying he will not attend.
“The International Criminal Court recently announced that it is seeking warrants for the arrest of Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, and Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas. The ICC is right. Both of these people are engaged in clear and outrageous violations of international law,” said Sanders.
“Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal. He should not be invited to address a joint meeting of Congress. I certainly will not attend,” he concluded.
The roots of the Sanders-Netanyahu relationship can be traced back to the early 2000s, when both individuals were emerging as influential figures in their respective spheres of influence.
Read: Ohio Sen. JD Vance Aims To Uncover Long-Term Health Impacts Of Toxic Train Disaster
Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, had already established himself as a vocal critic of U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Meanwhile, Netanyahu, a staunch conservative, had solidified his position as a prominent and unapologetic defender of Israel’s interests on the international stage.
As Sanders rose to prominence in the U.S. Senate, his criticism of Israeli policies, particularly in relation to the treatment of Palestinians, began to draw significant attention.
He openly condemned what he perceived as disproportionate use of force by the Israeli military and called for a more balanced and nuanced approach to the conflict. This stance, however, often put him at odds with Netanyahu, who fiercely defended Israel’s actions and resisted international pressure to modify its policies.
One of the pivotal moments in the Sanders-Netanyahu relationship was the 2014 Gaza War, also known as Operation Protective Edge. During this conflict, Israel launched a military offensive in the Gaza Strip, which resulted in the deaths of over 2,000 Palestinians, including a significant number of civilians. Sanders, along with many other U.S. lawmakers, condemned the high civilian casualties and called for a ceasefire, while Netanyahu maintained that the Israeli military’s actions were necessary to protect its citizens from Hamas’ rocket attacks.
Read: Six Months Have Passed Since Hamas Kidnapped Agam Berger. Her Father, Shlomi Berger Is Broken
The aftermath of the 2014 Gaza War further strained the relationship between Sanders and Netanyahu. Sanders, in a scathing statement, accused the Israeli Prime Minister of committing “clear and outrageous violations of international law” and called him a “war criminal.”
This inflammatory rhetoric only served to deepen the divide between the two leaders, setting the stage for an ongoing battle of ideologies and political posturing.
At the heart of the Sanders-Netanyahu divide lies a fundamental difference in their respective visions for achieving peace in the Middle East.
Sanders has consistently advocated for a more even-handed approach, calling for Israel to end its occupation of the Palestinian territories and to respect the rights of the Palestinian people.
Read: David Axelrod Says Dems Who Want Biden To Step Aside Should ‘Give Up’ On ‘Fantasy’
He has also been a proponent of a two-state solution, which would involve the creation of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel.
In contrast, Netanyahu has championed a more hardline stance, prioritizing Israel’s security concerns and resisting international pressure to make concessions to the Palestinians. He has been a vocal opponent of the two-state solution, arguing that it would jeopardize Israel’s strategic interests and expose its citizens to increased security risks.
Help support the Tampa Free Press by making any small donation by clicking here.
Android Users, Click To Download The Tampa Free Press App And Never Miss A Story. Follow Us On Facebook and Twitter. Sign up for our free newsletter.