President Donald J. Trump (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

Trump Team Seeks To Dismiss Jack Smith’s Election Interference Case, Citing Unlawful Appointment

President Donald J. Trump (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)
President Donald J. Trump (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

Former President Donald Trump’s legal team filed a motion Thursday to dismiss special counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case, alleging that Smith’s appointment was unlawful and that he should no longer receive taxpayer funds, according to court filings.

The motion escalates the ongoing case between Trump and Smith, which has seen increased activity over the past month. On October 2, Judge Tanya Chutkan released a redacted 165-page brief from Smith, detailing evidence against Trump. Trump’s lawyers argue the case is unconstitutional, claiming it violates the “Appointments and Appropriations Clauses” because Smith was not “properly appointed by law.”

READ: Trump Vows To Fire Special Counsel Jack Smith “Within 2 Seconds” If Re-Elected

“Even if Smith were a legitimate officer, which he is not, he would be a principal officer rather than an inferior one, and his appointment is unconstitutional, as he was neither nominated by the President nor confirmed by the Senate,” the filing contends. It further argues that Smith’s role, without effective oversight and with broad jurisdiction, violates the Constitution’s Appointments Clause.

Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith in November 2022 to oversee the investigation. Trump’s legal team contends Smith’s appointment as a private citizen was a targeted move without proper statutory authority, asserting that it violated constitutional guidelines as Trump campaigned for the presidency.

Citing a recent ruling from July 15, where Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed Smith’s separate case regarding Trump’s handling of classified documents on similar grounds, Trump’s filing referenced U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’ opinion on presidential immunity, suggesting that Smith’s role may be structurally unconstitutional.

READ: Missouri Sen Demands AG Garland Fork Over Communications Related To Jack Smith’s Latest Trump Indictment

In further support of their motion, Trump’s attorneys called for an end to Smith’s access to public funds, arguing that the special counsel’s office has been “improperly drawing from the Treasury without statutory authorization.” They contend that Smith’s office has spent over $36 million targeting Trump and his associates during the campaign season without proper appropriations from Congress.

Trump’s team also referenced recent remarks by President Joe Biden at a New Hampshire Democratic National Committee office, where Biden commented on “locking up” Trump before clarifying he meant politically.

During an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt on Thursday, Trump reiterated his stance, stating he would fire Smith “within two seconds” if he wins the 2024 election, calling him “crooked.”

Trump’s lawyers opposed the public release of Smith’s new briefing on presidential immunity, but Judge Chutkan denied the request, releasing the evidence. In an October 18 response, Chutkan remarked that withholding evidence could be construed as “election interference.”

Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.

Android Users: Download our free app to stay up-to-date on the latest news.

Connect with us: Follow the Tampa Free Press on Facebook and Twitter for breaking news and updates.

Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox.

Login To Facebook To Comment