The Colorado primary ballot controversy has ignited a heated debate within the Republican Party, with presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy taking a bold stance in defense of election integrity.
In a show of solidarity with former President Trump, Ramaswamy made the decision to pull his name from the ballot, calling out what he believes to be an unconstitutional and flagrant violation of the democratic process.
While disappointed by the lack of support from other GOP candidates, Ramaswamy sees his action as leading by example and hopes others will join him in standing up against election interference.
“It’s an unconstitutional and flagrant violation of the way we conduct elections in this country. This is not the way we do things in the United States of America. We the people are the ones who select our leaders, not unelected cabals of Democrat judges and back office,” Ramaswamy told Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo.
“If every Republican in the Colorado GOP primary also says, ‘We’re not participating,’ then this blatant act of election interference has no impact, so I wanted to lead by example to say that, if they are going to forcibly remove Trump’s name from that ballot, then I would voluntarily remove myself too, and called on Chris Christie and Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis to do the same thing. I have to say, I was disappointed to hear radio silence or worse from those other candidates who said they wanted to still collect their delegates.”
The Unprecedented Decision
The Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling to remove Trump from the state’s primary ballot has sparked outrage among conservatives.
Ramaswamy views this decision as an attack on democracy, arguing that it goes against the fundamental principles on which the United States was built. He believes that the power to select leaders should rest with the people, not unelected judges or political elites.
The court’s 4-3 ruling, based on the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution and citing Trump’s conduct during the Capitol riot, has raised concerns about the extent of judicial power and its potential impact on the electoral process.
Read: Tucker Says He’s Off The Trump Train If Former South Carolina Gov. Haley Picked As His No. 2
Ramaswamy’s Decision: Leading by Example
Ramaswamy’s decision to voluntarily remove his name from the Colorado primary ballot is driven by practicality and principle. He believes that if every Republican candidate in the state follows suit, the act of election interference will lose its impact.
By taking this stand, Ramaswamy hopes to send a powerful message about the importance of protecting the constitutional republic and the integrity of the electoral system.
He has called on fellow candidates, such as Chris Christie, Nikki Haley, and Ron DeSantis, to join him in withdrawing from the ballot. However, he expresses disappointment at their lack of response or, in some cases, their intention to continue collecting delegates despite the controversy.
The Value of Winning
While Ramaswamy acknowledges that winning the election would be easier without Trump in the race, he emphasizes that the ultimate goal is not just victory but the preservation of the constitutional republic.
He believes that standing up against election interference is a principle that should transcend personal ambitions.
Collecting a small number of delegates while tolerating blatant election interference holds little value for Ramaswamy. Instead, he sees the pledge to remove names from the ballot as a collective effort to solve the problem and ensure the integrity of the Republican Party.
Read: Former Federal Prosecutor Says Georgia Case Is Democrats ‘Best Hope’ To Jail Trump
Solidarity Among Trump’s Rivals
Although no other candidates have pledged to remove their names from the Colorado primary ballot, Trump’s rivals within the Republican Party have shown solidarity with him in different ways. Ron DeSantis criticizes the Left’s abuse of judicial power and calls for a reversal of the decision.
Nikki Haley argues that decisions about candidates should be in the hands of voters, not judges. Chris Christie, despite his previous disagreements with Trump, believes that it is the voters who should decide the president, not the courts. These statements reflect a shared concern about the potential overreach of judicial power and the importance of preserving the democratic process.
Critics’ Perspective on the Ruling
Critics of the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision argue that it infringes upon the rights of voters and undermines the democratic process. They believe that judges should not have the authority to make decisions that should be left to the electorate.
Former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley expresses the need for voters to have a say in selecting their leaders, and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie emphasizes the importance of the voters’ role in determining who becomes president. These criticisms highlight the broader debate surrounding the balance of power between the judiciary and the people.
Read: Special Counsel Jack Smith Calls Trump Supreme Court Filing ‘Misguided’
The Road Ahead: Likely Appeals and Impact
Although the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling is currently stayed until January 4th pending likely appeals, the controversy surrounding the primary ballot has raised significant concerns.
The outcome of the appeals process will have far-reaching implications for the electoral process and the Republican Party. The decision will shape the narrative around election integrity and the role of judges in candidate selection. It remains to be seen how the legal battle will unfold and what impact it will have on future elections.
Android Users, Click To Download The Free Press App And Never Miss A Story. Follow Us On Facebook and Twitter. Sign up for our free newsletter.
We can’t do this without your help. Visit our GiveSendGo page and donate any dollar amount; every penny helps.