A Florida appeals court has sided with Cleveland Clinic Indian River Hospital in a lawsuit stemming from the 2022 fatal shooting of a mental-health patient, Zachary Taylor Anderson, who was left unrestrained in the hospital’s emergency room. The ruling, issued Wednesday by a three-judge panel of the 4th District Court of Appeal, found that the lawsuit filed by Anderson’s estate should have been dismissed because it failed to comply with Florida’s pre-suit notice requirement for medical malpractice cases.
The decision overturns a lower court ruling and highlights the legal distinction between medical malpractice and ordinary negligence in cases involving healthcare providers. The court concluded that the hospital’s actions were directly tied to Anderson’s medical care, making the pre-suit notice requirement applicable.
READ: Florida, Massachusetts Senators Slam Federal Reserve Chair Powell Over “Culture Of Corruption”
Zachary Taylor Anderson was brought to Cleveland Clinic Indian River Hospital in 2022 under the Baker Act, a Florida law that allows individuals experiencing mental health crises to be involuntarily held for evaluation and treatment. Anderson had inflicted self-harm, cutting his arms, legs, and other parts of his body, and was admitted for both mental health treatment and care for his physical injuries.
According to court documents, Anderson was left unrestrained in the emergency room hallway. While unsupervised, he grabbed a pair of scissors from a nurse’s pocket and ran toward sheriff’s deputies stationed at the hospital. The deputies fatally shot Anderson in what was described as a response to an immediate threat.
Anderson’s estate filed a lawsuit against the hospital, alleging negligence in failing to properly restrain or supervise him, which they argued led directly to his death. The hospital, however, contended that the case should be classified as a medical malpractice claim, which under Florida law requires plaintiffs to provide pre-suit notice to healthcare providers before filing a lawsuit. This notice allows providers an opportunity to investigate the claim and potentially settle it before litigation begins.
Attorneys for Anderson’s estate argued that the case involved ordinary negligence, not medical malpractice, and therefore should not be subject to the pre-suit notice requirement. They claimed that the hospital’s failure to restrain Anderson was a basic safety oversight unrelated to his medical treatment.
In an eight-page opinion written by Judge Robert Gross, the appeals court rejected the estate’s argument, ruling that the hospital’s actions were directly tied to Anderson’s medical care. The court emphasized that the hospital was actively treating Anderson for both his mental health condition and physical injuries at the time of the incident.
“Here, the acts that caused injury are the hospital’s failure to restrain or properly supervise decedent just after he was admitted and taken into custody as a danger to himself under the Baker Act,” the opinion stated. “The hospital is a medical provider and was acting in that capacity while actively treating decedent for his mental illness and physical injuries.”
The court concluded that the allegations in the lawsuit fell under the scope of medical malpractice, making the pre-suit notice requirement mandatory. As a result, the case should have been dismissed for noncompliance with Florida law.
Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Connect with us: Follow the Tampa Free Press on Facebook and Twitter for breaking news and updates.
Sign up: Subscribe to our free newsletter for a curated selection of top stories delivered straight to your inbox.